I was recently visiting a friend in the United Kingdom. Her father-in-law has made, and lost, a significant amount of money over his lifetime. He is now of retirement age and, it would appear, is concerned about his financial well-being and security.
His only son – my friend’s husband – has his name on the paperwork for his parents’ mortgage, thus enabling them to have their own roof over their heads, and he also pays a proportion of it.
The older gentleman has just requested that his name also be added to the official documents. We can only speculate as to the reasons why. Could it be, as his daughter-in-law thinks, that he doesn’t trust her enough to allow them to stay put in their own home should her husband die before they do? Or is it his way of protecting his home from any possible break-up of his son’s marriage? All eligible assets in such an event would be split between the spouses.
Or is it simply a man who feels vulnerable trying to regain a bit of control.
Whatever the reason, it has certainly caused tempers to flare. The daughter-in-law believes the home is an asset that her children should inherit. After all, their father has been paying towards it and is legally liable should there be a problem with meeting payments. Plus, it has impacted on their lifestyle. There are many other things they could be doing with the money that now pays the mortgage.
She does not believe that the asset should be split among the grandparents’ children equally and is concerned that, should the deeds change, then this could be a possibility.
The son (her husband) is caught between a rock and a hard place; he wants to be the dutiful son and provide his parents with peace of mind. He doesn’t want to get into any potential confrontation with them, but equally doesn’t want the grief he’s getting at home regarding the implications of having a change to the deeds.
What do you think he should do?
The thing is, once this type of thing is asked of someone, there it is: out in the open, needing to be addressed.
It’s so unfortunate, but so very real, that many a family and friendship has fallen foul of money issues. Or should that be: has fallen foul of addressing who owes and who owns what.
Of course we all want to do right by our parents and extended families. We also want to do right by ourselves and our own family units, too. And they don’t need to be mutually exclusive.
But it seems that they often are, or are perceived to be. There appears to be a mixed bag of obligation, duty, embarrassment over the small print and putting all the paperwork in order, coupled with resistance to having very frank discussions of what this means for all the individuals concerned.
Instead of families coming together to deal with money and life issues, they can become battlegrounds of vested interests, of old scores being settled, and the worst coming out in people you once thought you knew better than anyone – and believed you could depend on.
I bet my bottom dollar you, or someone you know, has a horror story to share. How about, for example, the family where one sibling takes on the full burden of caring for elderly or sick parents, earning less as a result – if not nothing – with the implicit understanding that they will eventually get a larger share of the family home. But when the parents die, or are moved into care, their siblings renege on the understanding.
The original article was first published in The National
